The controversy revolves around Tata Chemicals’ Mithapur facility and a series of open‑ditch channels that have historically carried effluent into the Gulf of Kutch. In 2006 the district collector denied the company's claim to the land, a decision that later became the cornerstone of a protracted lawsuit.

High Court’s verdict

On 25 May, the Gujarat High Court dismissed Tata Chemicals’ plea, holding that the corporation possessed no proprietary rights over the age‑old wastewater conduits and that the state‑owned coastal area designated as a marine sanctuary had been unlawfully occupied.

Supreme Court’s temporary stay

A three‑judge bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana, issued a notice on Tata Chemicals’ petition challenging the High Court order. The apex court instructed that no coercive measures be taken against the firm while the petition is under review, effectively granting it interim protection.

The bench also directed the Gujarat government to file its written reply by 2 November, after which the matter will return to the Supreme Court for further deliberation.

Mandated environmental review

The High Court had previously ordered the Gujarat Pollution Control Board to constitute an expert panel to assess the ecological impact on the affected coastal stretch. The panel was tasked with suggesting remedial actions, estimating compensation, and completing its study within three months.

Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi, representing Tata Chemicals before the Supreme Court, highlighted that the dispute raises both environmental protection issues and allegations of illegal land encroachment.

What lies ahead?

With the Supreme Court’s stay in effect, Tata Chemicals is insulated from any immediate enforcement steps. The next critical step is the Gujarat government’s written response; following that, the apex court will decide whether the company’s broader challenge to the High Court’s findings will proceed.